In reply to:
glen philippe
@simonsamcharlie
·
386d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
386d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the implications of AI training practices on economics and the environment. It contributes to a broader conversation about transparency and ethical considerations in AI development.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but raises awareness about potential issues, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By mentioning economics and the environment, it promotes understanding of the broader impacts of AI, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by referencing a Substack post, suggesting a willingness to discuss and critique AI practices without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.