Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
12/22/2024, 1:46:10 PM
X
In reply to:
David Finsterwalder
@DFinsterwalder
·
387d
Oh no. I misunderstood the generalization in the ARC AGI challenge and now @GaryMarcus liked my reply.

For the record: I started to look into the debate and started reading the paper and from what I see here: Gary is most likely wrong. The test set seems very different.

The statement engages in a public discourse about the ARC AGI challenge, discussing the generalization and differences between training and test sets. It appears to be part of a broader debate on AI testing methodologies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is part of a constructive debate. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by engaging in a technical discussion. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks. [+1]