Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in a public discourse about the nature of artificial general intelligence (AGI) and the validity of claims made by AI developers. It critiques the approach of solving the ARC benchmark through training rather than reasoning, aligning with a broader debate on AI development and ethics.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on critiquing ideas rather than individuals, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the distinction between true AGI and benchmark optimization, fostering a more informed discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the claims about AGI without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement responsibly uses the platform to discuss important issues in AI development, upholding the principles of free speech and integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.