Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
12/22/2024, 4:00:46 PM
X
In reply to:
Tails
@ChrisTaylo79273
·
390d
@GaryMarcus @nrehiew_ Sorry about that @GaryMarcus, you didn’t say it could self improve. I’m sorry for that statement, I did remember that incorrectly. “A month after GPT-4 was released, OpenAI released ChatGPT plug-ins, which quickly led others to develop something called AutoGPT. With direct…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
390d
@ChrisTaylo79273 @nrehiew_ I didn’t say that, go check the transcript, please
Tails
@ChrisTaylo79273
·
390d
@nrehiew_ Because you you have people still listening to @GaryMarcus after his brilliant takes. For instance, he testified in front of of congress, that autogpt, was self improving itself… you have experts in fields that think their experience translates into ml. Even though they clearly…
wh
@nrehiew_
·
390d
How is this even an issue for debate? You are supposed to train on the training set and test on the test set. This is Intro to ML 101 stuff

The statement is part of a discussion about the capabilities and reliability of AI models like AutoGPT. It addresses a misunderstanding about AI self-improvement and reflects on the reliability of such models. The tone is corrective and informative, aiming to clarify previous statements.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to correct misinformation, which aligns with striving to do no harm with words. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the topic rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a misunderstanding and providing clarification. [+1]