In reply to:
μ
@michalwols
·
390d
The statement is a response to an accusation of hype and deception in a business transaction involving a startup acquisition by Uber. The tone is defensive and demands a retraction of what is perceived as defamation. The intent is to protect the reputation of individuals associated with the project and to correct what is seen as misinformation.
- The statement aims to correct misinformation, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm, but the tone is confrontational.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement accuses another user of defamation, which could be seen as a form of harassment if not substantiated, potentially violating the principle of respecting dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement demands a retraction and labels the words as dishonest and incorrect, which could be seen as a personal attack rather than engaging in constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement urges the other party to correct their mistake, aligning with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.