The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of drawing premature conclusions in scientific research, particularly in the context of AI and machine learning. It calls for a focus on proper scientific methodology, which is a substantive engagement with public issues.
- The statement aligns with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for careful scientific analysis rather than jumping to conclusions, which can lead to misinformation or harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by encouraging a focus on scientific rigor, which is essential for informed public discourse. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by supporting Gary Marcus's call for scientific rigor without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.