Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement engages in a discussion about the capabilities of AI, specifically in the context of comprehension and prediction. It references a scholarly article proposing a new method for testing comprehension using crowdsourcing, which is relevant to the ongoing debate about AI's ability to understand and process information like humans. The tone is constructive and aims to contribute to the dialogue on AI development.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and contributes positively to the discussion by providing a resource for further exploration. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by linking to a scholarly article that offers a novel approach to comprehension testing. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a conversation about AI capabilities, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]