Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
12/23/2024, 8:07:17 PM
X
In reply to:
Tim Spalding 🇺🇦
@librarythingtim
·
397d
@GaryMarcus But also, even if one exempts all those factors, they're not more intelligent. Not unless "context" means "whatever would be necessary to prompt it that would make it answer right for me."
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
397d
This does not make sense, because “memory, real-time learning, context, and understanding of … environment” ARE aspects of intelligence.
Bindu Reddy
@bindureddy
·
397d
If you have used LLMs extensively, you know they are WAY MORE INTELLIGENT than mere mortals.

The bottleneck is not intelligence.

The bottlenecks are memory, real-time learning, context, and understanding of their environment.

So yeah, o1 and Sonnet are already way more…

The statement is part of a public discourse on the nature of intelligence in large language models (LLMs) and their comparison to human intelligence. The conversation involves a debate on what constitutes intelligence and the limitations of LLMs.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, maintaining a neutral tone.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does engage in a technical discussion that could lead to better understanding of AI capabilities.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a point made in the conversation, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to engage in a meaningful discussion about AI intelligence. [+1]