Mahesh Sathiamoorthy
@madiator
·
398d
The statement engages in a public discourse about the validity of AI testing methods and results, specifically addressing concerns about the O3 tests and their scientific integrity. The tone is defensive and somewhat dismissive of opposing views, focusing on the speaker's perspective and credibility.
- The statement does not directly harm others but dismisses opposing views without engaging constructively, which could be seen as indirectly harmful to discourse. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does dismiss others' concerns as 'whining,' which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue with those in disagreement, instead dismissing their concerns as 'whining.' This is a form of personal attack. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.