Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
12/24/2024, 3:57:15 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
397d
An AI CEO I don’t know making basically the same points I made - the tests of o3 were just bad science and also misleading about prior results, exactly as I described in my pinned tweet. Anybody with good judgement and integrity can see that.

People whining about my alleged bias…
Mahesh Sathiamoorthy
@madiator
·
398d
People are panicking with O3 doing really well on ARC-AGI, so wanted to share some perspectives.

1. OpenAI trained on 75% of the training set of ARC-AGI. On X there has been a lot of discussion around this, but wanted to share what i think. So training on train set is fine by ML…

The statement is a response to a conversation about AI testing and perceived biases, indicating engagement in public discourse on the topic of AI ethics and testing standards.

  1. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement accuses others of unfairly attacking the speaker, which could be seen as a personal attack rather than engaging in constructive criticism or dialogue. [-1]