Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
12/24/2024, 4:05:57 PM
X
In reply to:
Mahesh Sathiamoorthy
@madiator
·
397d
@GaryMarcus But I do believe AGI is coming.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
397d
An AI CEO I don’t know making basically the same points I made - the tests of o3 were just bad science and also misleading about prior results, exactly as I described in my pinned tweet. Anybody with good judgement and integrity can see that.

People whining about my alleged bias…
Mahesh Sathiamoorthy
@madiator
·
398d
People are panicking with O3 doing really well on ARC-AGI, so wanted to share some perspectives.

1. OpenAI trained on 75% of the training set of ARC-AGI. On X there has been a lot of discussion around this, but wanted to share what i think. So training on train set is fine by ML…

The statement engages in a discussion about the methodologies and conclusions related to AI and AGI, referencing criticisms and support for certain scientific approaches. It addresses public concerns about AI development and the integrity of scientific testing, thus constituting public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm and instead focuses on discussing methodologies, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by discussing the importance of methodology in scientific presentations, which aligns with promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of scientific methodologies without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]