Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
12/24/2024, 4:09:29 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
397d
@madiator So do I! Just not soon.

What is impressive is that you are more on the “soon” side than I am — but reached similar conclusions about the shortcomings in the presentations.

I was heavily attacked for making very similar points.

But like you I think methodology matters.
Mahesh Sathiamoorthy
@madiator
·
397d
@GaryMarcus But I do believe AGI is coming.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
397d
An AI CEO I don’t know making basically the same points I made - the tests of o3 were just bad science and also misleading about prior results, exactly as I described in my pinned tweet. Anybody with good judgement and integrity can see that.

People whining about my alleged bias…
Mahesh Sathiamoorthy
@madiator
·
398d
People are panicking with O3 doing really well on ARC-AGI, so wanted to share some perspectives.

1. OpenAI trained on 75% of the training set of ARC-AGI. On X there has been a lot of discussion around this, but wanted to share what i think. So training on train set is fine by ML…

The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the development and evaluation of AI technologies, specifically addressing concerns about the methodology and data used in testing AI models like o3. It questions the confidence in o3 as a step towards AGI, contributing to the broader debate on AI advancements and their implications.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm; it raises questions about the validity of claims regarding AI advancements.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by questioning the methodology and encouraging a deeper examination of AI claims. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the confidence in o3 without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by responsibly questioning the claims about AI advancements, contributing to the public discourse on AI. [+1]