Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement is part of a public discourse on the validity and methodology of AI testing, specifically regarding the ARC tests and their implications for AI reasoning versus memorization. The tone is constructive, suggesting a modification to the language used in the discussion to better reflect the situation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and is constructive in nature, suggesting a softer language to improve clarity and understanding. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by suggesting a more accurate term, which can help in clarifying the discussion and fostering empathy among participants. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by agreeing with the previous point and suggesting a minor modification, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]