Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
12/24/2024, 5:21:19 PM
X
In reply to:
Adan Z Becerra, PhD
@AdanBecerraPhD
路
398d
@GaryMarcus Alternatively, we will get to AGI (whenever that is) and realize chasing some subjective definition doesn鈥檛 cause the outcomes we want it to cause. I prefer non-AGI tech that can save lives, prevent diseases (mRNA vaccine) vs an AGI tech that cannot do the above
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
398d
Mark my words: when AGI does actually come, perhaps 10 or 20 years from now, people will laugh at the idea that o3 was close to AGI.
Mikel Bober-Irizar
@mikb0b
路
400d
You've seen some of the puzzles o3 failed, but have you seen the attempts?

Yesterday, @OpenAI's o3 dramatically beat the SOTA at @arcprize. But there were 34 tasks that even it couldn't solve with 16 hours of thinking.

I've compiled and analyzed all of o3's mistakes below 馃У

The statement engages in a discussion about the relative contributions of different technologies, specifically AlphaFold and ChatGPT, in the context of broader technological advancements like AGI. It suggests a preference for technologies with tangible benefits, such as those in healthcare, over speculative advancements in artificial intelligence.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and instead focuses on the positive impact of certain technologies.聽[+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by highlighting the practical benefits of AlphaFold, which contributes to scientific and medical advancements.聽[+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by comparing technologies based on their contributions, without resorting to personal attacks.聽[+1]