In reply to:
Alexandre Chiavegatto Filho
@SaudenoBR
·
395d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
395d
The statement is part of a public discourse on the topic of AI development and the limitations of deep learning. It addresses a public issue by discussing the progress and challenges in AI technology, specifically deep learning, and clarifies a previous statement made by the author.
- The statement does not use harmful language and aims to clarify a misunderstanding, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by encouraging the reader to reread the paper carefully, which aligns with promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a misunderstanding without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to the principle of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement acknowledges a potential misunderstanding and seeks to clarify it, which aligns with acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.