Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47

Score 83

@SaudenoBR In sum, you said “quite a few”, but gave only one, and that was based on an erroneous understanding of the original paper.

12/31/2024, 3:51:10 PM

In reply to:

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

395d

@SaudenoBR i didn’t say it would make no further progress, I said it would get stuck on certain problems, which still remain, and that scaling would was not a physical law and would not hold indefinitely or solve those specific problems; please reread the actual paper carefully and my line…

Alexandre Chiavegatto Filho

@SaudenoBR

395d

@GaryMarcus There are quite a few, the most famous is probably when you said deep learning was starting to hit a wall in 2022 (before the release of ChatGPT)

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

395d

Gary haters, here’s your chance! For an upcoming roundup, what AI predictions have I made that were wrong?

The statement is part of a public discourse on the topic of AI predictions and the validity of claims made by a public figure, Gary Marcus. The tone is corrective and aims to clarify a misunderstanding in the ongoing discussion.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not cause harm and is focused on correcting a misunderstanding, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding by pointing out an error in the interpretation of a paper, which can lead to a more informed discussion. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the content of the argument rather than attacking the individual, adhering to the principle of avoiding personal attacks. [+1]