Gary Marcus

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 37
1/6/2025, 12:48:40 AM
X
In reply to:
Miguel Nicolelis
@MiguelNicolelis
·
320d
@GaryMarcus @Grady_Booch From neuroscientist to neuroscientist, this “wait for AGI” is sounding more and more like the wait for the Messiah. And both will never happen. The brain is not digital - it works in analog - and will never be replaced by a Turing machine, nor a LLM, nor neuro-AI, whatever it is!
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
320d
AGI might – or might not — arrive by 2045. (@Grady_Booch thinks it won’t happen this century.)

But the thought that the wealthy will give up their private islands and political power that they have gained with their money is just … absurd.
Soumil Rathi
@soumilrathi
·
320d
@DrewHawkswood @DeryaTR_ @GaryMarcus Capitalism (and money) won’t exist post AGI adoption

Even the more conservative timelines claim it’ll happen by 2045

The statement engages in a discussion about the future of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), contributing to a broader debate on technological advancement and its implications. The tone is analytical and speculative, focusing on the feasibility and timeline of AGI development.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language and maintains a neutral tone, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging different perspectives on AGI, fostering a balanced view. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by agreeing with some points and disagreeing with others without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]