Gary Marcus

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 37
1/6/2025, 12:52:23 AM
X
In reply to:
Mohammed Lubbad 馃嚨馃嚫
@engmlubbad
路
319d
@GaryMarcus Concerns surrounding o1 and OpenAI could indeed reflect broader implications for future models like o3. What specific gotchas are you anticipating?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
319d
This doesn鈥檛 look great for o1 or OpenAI.

We may see similar gotchas for o3 in the fullness of time.
Alejandro Cuadron
@Alex_Cuadron
路
320d
Surprising find: OpenAI's O1 - reasoning-high only hit 30% on SWE-Bench Verified - far below their 48.9% claim. Even more interesting: Claude achieves 53% in the same framework. Something's off with O1's "enhanced reasoning"... 馃У1/8

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the performance and potential limitations of AI models, specifically OpenAI's O1 and future models like O3. It reflects on the broader implications of AI capabilities in open-ended tasks.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm; it provides a critical perspective on AI performance.聽[+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by discussing potential limitations of AI models.聽[+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks.聽[+1]