In reply to:
Mariam Hassan
@mh0117019950
·
202d
The statement criticizes the allocation of resources towards large language models (LLMs) and suggests that this focus detracts from other important areas. It engages in a broader debate about the development and prioritization of artificial general intelligence (AGI).
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a negative view of current resource allocation.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it dismisses the efforts on LLMs without offering constructive alternatives. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses the topic rather than engaging with the points made by others. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to critique current trends in AI development, which could be seen as an attempt to redirect focus for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be more responsible by engaging constructively with the topic.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.