Gary Marcus

Rank 10 of 47
|
Score 110
1/6/2025, 12:52:45 PM
X
In reply to:
Greg ⏹️ Colbourn
@gcolbourn
·
201d
@GaryMarcus What if there doesn't need to be *principled* solutions? And prosaic AGI is just a matter of scaling a bit further? (This seems likely to me). ARC AGI falling to o3 is evidence of this.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
202d
An MIT professor just asked me, how can you be so confident that OpenAI isn’t very close to AGI?

Here is a thread of links to a several recent observations that I think show how far we are from robust intelligence.

Importantly, all of them are *known* problems, many that I…

The statement is part of a public discourse on the topic of artificial general intelligence (AGI) and its development. The conversation involves a discussion on the principles and evidence related to AGI, with references to specific concepts like ARC and o3. The tone is academic and seeks to clarify or correct a misunderstanding in the ongoing debate.

  1. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement encourages understanding by asking the other party to read the full thread and links, which promotes informed discussion. [+1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the content of the discussion rather than attacking the individual, thus avoiding personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement implicitly acknowledges the possibility of misunderstanding by suggesting a review of the full thread, which aligns with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+1]