Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64

The statement engages in a discussion about the interpretability of AI systems, contrasting the interpretability of systems like GPS with the challenges faced by more complex models like LLMs. It contributes to the public discourse on AI transparency and accountability.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and contributes to a factual discussion about AI interpretability. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by providing an example of interpretable AI systems, fostering a more nuanced view of AI capabilities. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages constructively with a previous comment, offering a counterpoint without personal attacks. [+1]