The statement expresses frustration with the perceived reluctance of experts to label current AI as AGI. It uses strong language and dismisses the need for expert validation, suggesting a personal claim to expertise.
- The statement uses aggressive language, which could be seen as harmful or disrespectful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The use of profanity and dismissive tone does not respect the dignity of others. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it dismisses opposing views without engagement. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement lacks constructive dialogue and resorts to personal attacks on experts. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.