The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the shifting definitions and perceptions of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). It critiques the reluctance to label current AI as AGI, suggesting that societal and expert approval are barriers. The tone is confrontational and dismissive, using strong language to emphasize frustration with the current discourse.
- The statement uses confrontational language, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The use of derogatory language does not respect the dignity of others and could be seen as a form of harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it dismisses opposing views without constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and instead uses personal attacks. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.