The statement engages in a discussion about the shifting definitions of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), suggesting that others are moving the goalposts while the speaker's criteria remain firm. The tone is defensive and critical, implying frustration with the lack of consensus on AGI definitions.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a defensive tone that could escalate tensions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but uses dismissive language that could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive elements and uses dismissive language, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.