Michael Schellenberger

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -89
1/9/2025, 12:08:06 AM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
251d
Climate change is causing the fires in L.A., says the media. But one of the government's top fire experts says, “I don't think these fires are the result of climate change." The media blame climate change to divert attention from the incompetence of the politicians they like.

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the causes of L.A. fires, a significant public issue. It presents an alternative viewpoint to the common narrative that climate change is the primary cause, suggesting human presence as a factor. The tone is assertive, aiming to challenge prevailing media narratives.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but could mislead if not supported by evidence, potentially affecting public understanding of climate issues. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It challenges existing narratives, which can promote understanding if done constructively, but lacks empathy for those affected by fires.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue by presenting an expert opinion, but it could be seen as dismissive of opposing views without thorough evidence.