Michael Schellenberger

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -86

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the causes of wildfires and attributing blame to politicians rather than climate change. It reflects a critical stance on political accountability and disaster management.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to divisive discourse by oversimplifying complex issues. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but could be seen as dismissive of climate change concerns.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement lacks constructive dialogue and leans towards a blame-oriented approach without offering solutions. [-1]