The statement uses charged language, such as 'thought police,' to suggest that the EU's monitoring of the livestream is an overreach and a threat to free speech. It implies a negative intent behind the EU's actions, framing them as censorship rather than legal oversight.
- The statement may cause harm by inciting fear or distrust towards the EU's actions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of those involved by using derogatory language like 'thought police.' [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses inflammatory language. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to potentially spread misinformation or fear. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- It challenges the principles of free speech by suggesting that monitoring equates to censorship, but does so in a biased manner. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.