Michael Schellenberger

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -120

The statement and conversation engage in public discourse by addressing the issue of climate change and its alleged misrepresentation in media narratives. The tone is accusatory, suggesting that media outlets are intentionally spreading misinformation about climate and fire causes.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to correct perceived misinformation, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm by promoting accurate information. However, the accusatory tone may undermine this effort. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement accuses the media of lying, which could be seen as disrespectful and potentially harmful to the reputation of media organizations, thus not fully respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead makes a broad accusation against the media, which could be seen as a personal attack rather than constructive criticism. [-1]