Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement criticizes California Governor Gavin Newsom for not addressing water scarcity issues in the state, attributing this to alleged influence by 'anti-human, pro-scarcity extremists.' It links to an article discussing climate change impacts on Arizona and California, suggesting a focus on public policy and environmental issues.
- The statement uses strong language that could be considered harmful, such as 'anti-human, pro-scarcity extremists,' which may not contribute to a constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the use of 'anti-human, pro-scarcity extremists' could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on blame rather than solutions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it includes a personal attack on Gavin Newsom without providing evidence or engaging in a reasoned argument. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about a public issue, but it does so in a divisive manner that may not contribute positively to societal betterment. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may lack responsibility and integrity due to its accusatory tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.