Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
13d
The statement by @shellenberger appears to engage in public discourse as it addresses a public issue concerning the management of fires in Los Angeles and criticizes public officials and a political party. The tone is accusatory, suggesting that the officials are lying about the preventability of the fires.
- The statement accuses public officials of lying, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does make a strong accusation against specific individuals and a political party, which could be seen as disrespectful if not backed by evidence. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a direct accusation without providing evidence or inviting discussion, thus violating this principle. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses a public platform to make a serious accusation, which requires responsibility and integrity. Without evidence, it may not fully uphold this principle. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.