In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
13d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing a public issue related to budget cuts and their impact on recent events in Los Angeles. It critiques the mayor's decision and implies a lack of accountability.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of the mayor's actions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does criticize a public figure.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or evidence, and it could be seen as a personal attack on the mayor's credibility. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no acknowledgment of potential mistakes or misinformation in the statement. [-1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses free speech to critique a public figure, but it lacks responsibility in providing evidence or constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.