Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
11d
The statement criticizes media reactions and uses charged language like 'woke thought police,' which can be seen as dismissive and polarizing. It implies a conflict between free speech and censorship, aligning with broader public debates on these issues.
- The statement uses dismissive language that could contribute to divisiveness, potentially causing harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The use of 'woke thought police' could be seen as disrespectful and dismissive of differing viewpoints. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead using polarizing language. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, opting for a more confrontational tone. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.