In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
9d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
11d
The statement and accompanying images discuss Meta's policy changes and their implications, touching on themes of corporate governance, free speech, and political influence. The tone is critical of media reactions and suggests a shift in Meta's approach to content moderation and diversity policies.
- The statement critiques media reactions, which could be seen as harmful if it misrepresents their intentions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but could be seen as dismissive of concerns about diversity and inclusion. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of Meta's policy changes but lacks empathy for affected employees. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of media and policy changes but avoids personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to discuss societal issues like free speech and corporate responsibility. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.