Gary Marcus

Rank 25 of 47
|
Score 40

The statement engages in a discussion about the differences in perspectives between East Coast academics and West Coast industry professionals regarding AI's impact and challenges. It critiques the West Coast's handling of distribution shift and factuality issues, contributing to a broader dialogue on AI reliability and solutions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on critiquing ideas rather than individuals, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding by highlighting specific issues (distribution shift and factuality) that need addressing, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing specific issues without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]