Gary Marcus

Rank 25 of 47
|
Score 40
1/11/2025, 3:00:58 PM
X
In reply to:
Boaz Barak
@boazbaraktcs
·
24d
@GaryMarcus I’m sorry to say but this is exactly what I meant in over indexing to temporary current limitations such factuality and robustness.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
24d
@boazbaraktcs I think the West Coasters have not fully reckoned with how much distribution shift continues to plague reliability, and still lack a robust solution to that.

They also lack a principled solution to problems of factuality.
Boaz Barak
@boazbaraktcs
·
24d
Moving between the worlds of East coast academics and SF industry is jarring in terms of the predictions of how AI will change the world in next ~5 years.

I think East coasters greatly underestimate the magnitude of change, and over index on temporary limitations of current…

The statement engages in a discussion about the challenges and solutions related to AI development, specifically addressing issues of factuality and reliability. It questions the existence of principled solutions and reflects on past experiences of broken promises, indicating a concern for accountability and progress in the field.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language and maintains a respectful tone, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement seeks to promote understanding by questioning the existence of principled solutions, which can foster a deeper discussion on the topic. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the lack of principled solutions without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement reflects a willingness to acknowledge past mistakes or broken promises in the field, which aligns with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+1]