Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of conditional federal aid, comparing aid policies towards California and Israel, and expressing a critical opinion on these policies.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language ('absolutely shameful') to express disapproval, which could be seen as inflammatory. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism without offering constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement criticizes a policy decision but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight perceived inconsistencies in policy, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by encouraging fair treatment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech to critique government policy, using the platform to raise awareness of the issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.