The Washington Post
@washingtonpost
·
23d
The statement addresses the societal issue of facial recognition technology and its implications, particularly its alleged racial biases and misuse by law enforcement. It calls for legislative action to ban the technology, aligning with public discourse on technology ethics and civil rights.
- The statement aims to prevent harm by advocating against a technology perceived as harmful to marginalized communities, aligning with the principle. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the dignity of others by highlighting potential racial biases and advocating against discriminatory practices. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by drawing attention to the impact of technology on Black and brown communities. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather focuses on the issue at hand, aligning with constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for societal betterment by calling for legislative action against perceived injustices. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses free speech to address a public concern, maintaining integrity in its call for action. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.