Gary Marcus

Rank 25 of 47
|
Score 40

The statement critiques the omission of a key conclusion from a study about the incidence of cardiac symptoms following COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents. It suggests that the omission is misleading and emphasizes the importance of acknowledging the full context of the study's findings.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to correct a perceived misleading omission, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm by promoting accurate information. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By highlighting the full context of the study, the statement promotes understanding and encourages a more nuanced view of the data. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out the omission without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by responsibly using the platform to address a public health issue with integrity. [+1]