In reply to:
Dr David Cartland BMedSci MBChB MRCGP (2014)
@CartlandDavid
·
25d
The statement is a critical response to a tweet discussing a study on cardiac symptoms in school children after receiving the Pfizer COVID vaccine. It accuses the original poster of omitting important information about the low incidence of significant arrhythmias and myocarditis, suggesting a misleading presentation of the data.
- The statement aims to correct potentially misleading information, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm by promoting accurate information. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use the word 'shameful,' which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By highlighting omitted information, the statement attempts to promote understanding and a more complete view of the study's findings. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the original tweet but uses the term 'shameful,' which could be seen as a personal attack rather than constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.