Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47

Score 64

⚠️⚠️

Easily jailbroken AI agents that excel at mimicry but lack the capacity and imperative to evaluate the consequences of their actions are going to cause massive harm.

“Mainlining them” into society is a huge mistake.

Pliny the Liberator 🐉

@elder_plinius

176d

Not to cause alarm, but if this agent had access to funds it would likely be capable of unaliving people 😱

For obvious reasons, I won't be demonstrating how this was done. All names and personal info will be redacted and no real-world actions occurred. This experiment was…

1/15/2025, 10:39:35 PM

The statement and accompanying images discuss the potential dangers of AI agents that can be easily manipulated to perform harmful actions. The tone is cautionary, highlighting the risks of integrating such AI into society without proper safeguards. The content suggests a serious concern about the ethical and safety implications of AI technology.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement warns about potential harm from AI, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+2]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
It respects privacy by redacting personal information, but the discussion of harmful actions could be seen as alarming. [-1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement aims to promote understanding of AI risks, aligning with promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
It uses the platform to raise awareness about societal risks, aligning with using influence for societal betterment. [+2]