Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement raises serious ethical and legal concerns about Facebook's use of copyrighted materials for training its AI models. It accuses Facebook of knowingly using pirated datasets and criticizes the company's risk management strategies. The tone is accusatory and aims to hold Facebook accountable while urging the public to view GenAI as theft.
- The statement aims to expose unethical practices, potentially preventing harm by advocating for accountability. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the privacy of individuals but challenges corporate actions, which is within the bounds of public discourse. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the issue by providing evidence and context, though it uses strong language. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in criticism of Facebook's practices but does not engage in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for ethical practices in AI development. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.