Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
1/16/2025, 1:09:13 AM
X
In reply to:
Dagan Shani
@daganshani1
·
176d
@GaryMarcus @sama You coined the term, but it actually became part of a very real debate about AI trajectory, and using the term sometimes makes people undervalue AI, giving themselves a pass on thinking deeply about its implications because - it's "just hype."
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
176d
Dear @sama,

Say what you said to Adam Grant it to my face. Debate me.

I coined the phrase “deep learning is hitting a wall” and I am absolutely *not* telling people not to think about AI. What you said is a distortion.

What am I actually doing is warning people about the…

The statement is part of a public discourse on the debate about AI's trajectory and the implications of using certain terms. It involves a discussion on how language can influence public perception and engagement with AI issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but highlights a concern about how language might lead to underestimating AI's impact. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on the debate rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by addressing how terminology can affect public discourse on AI. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the impact of language on public perception without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]