The statement is part of a public discourse on the trajectory and perception of AI technology. It addresses the debate over whether AI is 'hitting a wall' and the implications of such statements on public understanding and engagement with AI.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly cause harm but is part of a broader debate that could influence public perception of AI.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement indirectly promotes understanding by engaging in a discussion about AI's trajectory and public perception.
[+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement is part of a debate and does not engage in personal attacks, but rather questions the interpretation of a phrase.
[+1]