Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 115

The statement is part of a public discourse on the trajectory and perception of AI technology. It addresses the debate over whether AI is 'hitting a wall' and the implications of such statements on public understanding and engagement with AI.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but is part of a broader debate that could influence public perception of AI.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement indirectly promotes understanding by engaging in a discussion about AI's trajectory and public perception. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement is part of a debate and does not engage in personal attacks, but rather questions the interpretation of a phrase. [+1]