Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
1/16/2025, 1:45:26 AM
X
In reply to:
Dagan Shani
@daganshani1
·
171d
@GaryMarcus @sama I meant-Sam's claim isn't, I think, aimed directly at you. The term has taken on a life of its own, it's not "Machine Learning is hitting a wall" but rather "AI is hitting a wall", It's part of a broader sentiment that AI isn't delivering on its promises,so "don't worry about it"
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
171d
@daganshani1 @sama that doesn’t say “don’t think about it”.
Dagan Shani
@daganshani1
·
171d
@GaryMarcus @sama
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
171d
@daganshani1 @sama quote? who did that?
Dagan Shani
@daganshani1
·
171d
@GaryMarcus @sama You coined the term, but it actually became part of a very real debate about AI trajectory, and using the term sometimes makes people undervalue AI, giving themselves a pass on thinking deeply about its implications because - it's "just hype."
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
171d
Dear @sama,

Say what you said to Adam Grant it to my face. Debate me.

I coined the phrase “deep learning is hitting a wall” and I am absolutely *not* telling people not to think about AI. What you said is a distortion.

What am I actually doing is warning people about the…

The statement 'Let him clarify, then' is part of a broader discussion about AI's trajectory and public perception. The conversation involves a debate on whether AI is meeting expectations and the implications of using certain phrases. The tone is inquisitive and seeks clarification, promoting dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and encourages clarification, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By asking for clarification, it promotes understanding and empathy, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement encourages constructive dialogue by seeking clarification rather than making assumptions, aligning with the principle of engaging in constructive criticism. [+1]