Michael Schellenberger

Rank 33 of 47
|
Score -29

The statement criticizes California's policies, particularly DEI quotas and alleged corruption, suggesting they harm safety and ethics. It presents a strong opinion against these policies, linking them to broader societal issues like homelessness. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to challenge the effectiveness and ethics of California's governance.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could be seen as harmful by suggesting that DEI policies inherently sacrifice safety and ethics, which may not be substantiated and could perpetuate negative stereotypes. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of those involved in DEI initiatives, potentially engaging in a form of cyberbullying by attributing negative outcomes to these policies without clear evidence. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead making broad accusations without offering solutions or engaging with opposing viewpoints. [-2]