Michael Schellenberger

Rank 36 of 47
|
Score -58
In reply to:

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing criticisms and differing opinions regarding the leadership of Chief Crowley in the context of public safety and management of the LAFD. It reflects on the criticisms made by whistleblowers and the response to those criticisms, indicating a debate on leadership and accountability.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but discusses criticisms which could impact reputations.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy by not revealing personal details but engages in public criticism. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by sharing differing opinions on the criticisms. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in constructive dialogue by presenting both agreement and disagreement with the criticisms. [+1]