Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement discusses a political issue involving proxy voting for new mothers in Congress, highlighting a disagreement between two public figures. It addresses a public policy matter related to family support and legislative procedures, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it highlights a conflict that could impact perceptions of the individuals involved.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement brings attention to an issue that could promote understanding and empathy for new mothers in Congress, aligning with the principle of promoting compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement reports on a disagreement but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, adhering to the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By discussing a policy issue that affects new mothers, the statement uses its platform to potentially influence societal norms and legislative practices, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by discussing a relevant public issue and uses the platform responsibly by informing the public about a legislative matter. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.