Gary Marcus

Rank 25 of 47
|
Score 40
1/19/2025, 5:24:04 PM
X
In reply to:
shaperotator (e/λ)
@circlerotator
·
18d
@rhydhimma @GaryMarcus He is obviously implying Sam is lying and the government is deluded. Stop being dense.

Gary is someone who’s constantly wrong about AI but pretends he’s some Nostradamus
Rhydhimma (sci/acc)
@rhydhimma
·
18d
@circlerotator @GaryMarcus I don't think Sam or the Government is lying. That's not what Gary is saying either.

The meeting can be an important meeting about the next generation of AI approach.

But hyping it to be about some new discovery is just too much.

Even Sam thinks ASI is at least a year away.
shaperotator (e/λ)
@circlerotator
·
18d
@rhydhimma @GaryMarcus I mean the assumption is that the government and Sam Altman are both lying or deluded right?
Rhydhimma (sci/acc)
@rhydhimma
·
18d
@circlerotator @GaryMarcus Tell me why he is wrong with logic. Not emotion.

Btw, he is saying the same things that Sam, Elon, Dennis and others are saying.
shaperotator (e/λ)
@circlerotator
·
18d
@GaryMarcus You’re going to look so stupid in a few months
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
18d
In other news, Axios reports that Elon Musk will be briefing a closed-door cabinet committee on a reported next-level breakthrough in interstellar warp drive, which is now at the prototype level and will be commercially available for short galaxy hops “very soon”.

SpaceX…

The statement is part of a broader conversation about AI predictions and public figures' credibility, engaging with public issues related to technology and its societal implications. The tone is defensive, aiming to assert the accuracy of past predictions while challenging others' views.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others but is defensive and challenges others' credibility, which could be seen as indirectly harmful. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does participate in a conversation that includes personal attacks.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism but rather defends personal credibility and challenges others without personal attacks. [-1]