Gary Marcus

Rank 25 of 47

Score 40

Yes, I agree with Geoff Hinton that we should be cautious about further empowering agents, unless they can be made to respect human life and human values.

Probably that would require a different architecture, however.

Haider.

@slow_developer

18d

@GaryMarcus Garry, do you agree with Geoff?

1/19/2025, 5:26:27 PM

The statement expresses caution about empowering AI agents without ensuring they respect human life and values, suggesting a need for different AI architectures. It engages in public discourse by addressing the ethical and safety concerns of AI development.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement aligns with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for caution in AI development to prevent potential negative impacts on human life. [+2]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
It promotes understanding and empathy by emphasizing the importance of aligning AI with human values. [+2]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
The statement uses influence to advocate for responsible AI development, contributing to societal betterment. [+2]