In reply to:
Alessandro Della Corte
@Ognifedefingo
·
2d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
2d
Alessandro Della Corte
@Ognifedefingo
·
2d
The statement engages in a critical discussion about AI's capabilities and transparency, particularly in relation to OpenAI's claims and the effectiveness of its models. It questions the validity of AI outputs and seeks transparency in training data, which is a substantive engagement with public issues related to AI development and ethics.
- The statement does not directly harm but seeks to scrutinize AI's effectiveness, which can be seen as a constructive critique.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity, focusing on AI systems rather than individuals.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by requesting transparency, which can lead to better public comprehension of AI capabilities. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- Engages in constructive criticism by questioning the basis of AI's performance claims without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.